Ground zero in the fight against Ohio’s abortion ban
Ohio is on the brink of having the most restrictive abortion ban in the nation. This week, Ohio Senators will give a second hearing to the ‘heartbeat” bill, HB 125. The bill would ban abortion at the first moment a fetal heartbeat could be detected – earlier than most women even know they are pregnant – with no exceptions for rape, incest, or to protect the health of the mother.
The bill easily passed the Ohio House this spring surrounded by one of the most outrageous media circuses the Statehouse has ever seen. Two pregnant women were given ultrasounds during a hearing, thousands of red heart-shaped balloons and buttons have been delivered to legislators’ offices, and even an airplane-pulled banner circled the building.
All of this might be cute if the bill weren’t blatantly unconstitutional. Proponents have openly admitted that the bill is a tool to try to overturn Roe. The ensuing court battle would cost the state millions in a time when half a million Ohioans are unemployed.
Despite the massive media and fundraising drive backing the bill, we are fighting like mad to stop this proposal. Planned Parenthood volunteers have been writing newspapers and calling legislators to voice their disapproval, and it appears they may be getting through. On Friday, the conservative Cincinnati Inquirer published an editorial on the bill. Their take: “Now’s not the time.”
We need your help to stop this assault on women. If you’re in Ohio, please call the chairman of the Ohio Senate Health Committee, Sen. Scott Oelslager at (614) 466-0626. Ask him to stop wasting taxpayer’s time and money with this unconstitutional bill and go back to work trying to fix the state’s economy.
Gabriel Mann
E-Organizer
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of Ohio
Monday, December 12, 2011
|
Labels:
abortion,
Heartbeat Bill
|
Archive
- February 2012 (1)
- January 2012 (4)
- December 2011 (3)
- November 2011 (1)
- October 2011 (4)
- September 2011 (5)
- August 2011 (1)
- July 2011 (3)
- June 2011 (11)
- May 2011 (2)
- April 2011 (4)
- March 2011 (3)
- January 2011 (2)
- December 2010 (2)
- October 2010 (3)
- September 2010 (1)
- August 2010 (1)
- July 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (1)
- April 2010 (3)
- March 2010 (3)
- February 2010 (3)
- January 2010 (2)
- December 2009 (5)
- November 2009 (4)
- October 2009 (2)
- September 2009 (4)
- August 2009 (6)
- July 2009 (9)
- June 2009 (4)
- May 2009 (9)
- April 2009 (10)
- March 2009 (7)
- February 2009 (6)
- January 2009 (2)
1 comments:
It should have nothing to do with your side on the abortion debate (Griswold isn't going anywhere, so stop thinking you can ban abortions), but what matters is that this is an absolutely horrific time to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on a bill that is clearly going down in the courts.
Of course, we just approved of issue 3, which has the exact same issue...
Post a Comment