Excellent Letter to the Editor in today's Columbus Dispatch explaining why Rep. John Adams' HB 252 is a terrible idea:

Abortion-consent bill isn’t well thought out
Monday, July 27, 2009

Leave it to a man, state Rep. John Adams, R-Sidney, to come up with the idea that a woman should have the baby’s father’s permission to have an abortion. Of course, if a father’s permission is all that’s needed, the most important consequences of House Bill 252 are clearly overlooked.

What should also be included are the following options: the father’s commitment to pay for all expenses related to the unwanted pregnancy and birth; the father’s commitment to take the unwanted child and raise it free of any commitment on the mother’s part; the father’s commitment to pay all of the child’s expenses to age 21 (not just “child support”), should the mother decide to keep the baby; and in the case of an already-married father, it’s only fair that the wife should have to authorize the abortion, also. After all, she might want to keep the baby and raise it as her own.

These are only a few ramifications I can think of off the top of my head that could result from Adams’ brilliant idea. Maybe Adams should just try to get some roads blacktopped in his district.

DEBORAH BROWN
Plain City



-Gabriel

Read more...

"I think it's probably 50/50," Sen. George Voinovich (R-Ohio) told CNBC in an interview when asked how much of the GOP's opposition to healthcare reform proposals backed by Obama is driven by a desire to "declaw" the president politically.




-Gabriel

Read more...

Ohio Governor Ted Strickland received recognition from Planned Parenthood Federation of America. The full press release follows.

.


-Gabriel

Read more...

House Bill 252, the "Abortion Veto" bill, was featured on last night's evening news. Planned Parenthood's Gary Dougherty was interviewed about the unconstitutionality of the proposal.

For the complete video on 10TV.com, click here.
The following story is courtesy of 10tv.com.

Bill Would Require Man's OK For Abortion
Wednesday, July 22, 2009

COLUMBUS, Ohio — An Ohio lawmaker has introduced a bill that would prevent a woman from having an abortion unless she gets written consent from the biological father.

The proposal by State Rep. John Adams, R-Sidney, has stirred up controversy across the nation, 10TV's Kevin Landers reported.

"What does the father have to say in the abortion of his child? He has nothing to say (under current law)," Adams told 10TV News.

In the case where the father isn't known, House Bill 252 would compel the woman to provide a list of names of people who may be the father in an effort to determine paternity. The bill also would make it a crime for women to lie about who the father is, and make it illegal for doctors to perform abortions without the father's consent.

The bill would force a woman to have a child if the father does not agree to an abortion.

"That child should be born, not killed," Adams said.

The proposal has created a fire storm among pro-choice advocates.

Pro-Choice Ohio issued a statement saying Adams' bill is "completely out of touch with Ohio's mainstream values. The measure is a clear attack on a woman's freedom and privacy.... It does absolutely nothing to reduce the need for abortion."

The group Feminists for Choice released a statement saying "...this is ridiculous. It's just another mechanism for demonizing and isolating women who have sex."

Planned Parenthood vows to fight the legislation if it becomes law.

"It would require written informed consent of the potential father," Gary Daugherty, executive director of Planned Parenthood of Ohio, told 10TV News. "The (U.S.) Supreme Court has already spoken on the issue. It is clearly unconstitutional."

Adams' bill is not considered likely to gain approval in the Democratic-controlled House.

Watch 10TV News and refresh 10TV.com for additional information.

©2009 by 10TV.com. All rights reserved.

And here is the rest of it.

Read more...

Governor Strickland signed the state budget late last week, but before doing so, he used his line-item veto power to remove a provision for abstinence-only funding!

The line item would have required Ohio to apply for abstinence-only dollars from the federal government. These funds could only be used for abstinence-only programs, which are shown to be harmful to students. abstinence-only programs are incomplete Sex Ed curricula that do not include lessons on birth control and condoms.

According to a Columbus Dispatch editorial:

Studies show that teens in abstinence-only programs are no more likely to refrain from sex than are other teens. And some studies suggest abstinence-only curricula can be harmful because teens don't learn alternatives that can help protect them from pregnancy and diseases if they don't abstain from sex.

Additionally,

• Comprehensive Sex Ed classes are shown to dramatically increase the use of contraceptives and even delay the age when teens first have sex.
• All Comprehensive Sex Ed classes start with a solid discussion about the benefits of abstinence and why it's important to wait until adulthood before having sex.
• Seventy-one percent of Ohioans believe that schools should focus equally on the value of abstinence and the value of condoms and contraceptive use. The percentage rises to 81% among parents who have kids in school. (Quinnipiac poll)
• Abstinence-only programs, which do not teach birth control, leave teens and young adults without the knowledge of how to prevent a pregnancy or stop the spread of STD's once they become sexually active.

-Gabriel

Read more...

Hey faithful readers,

The Big OH blog is headed to Washington to meet with Ohio legislators to discuss women's health care.

We're asking Congress to protect reproductive health care in any reform packages. Women can't be left worse off than they are today. Access to health care providers like women's health clinics is crucial as an entry point into the health care system, and should be included in whatever changes Congress makes to the current bill.

Wish us luck, and we'll let you know how it goes.

-Gabriel

Read more...

Late last night, Senator Mikulski offered an amendment (Mikulski Amendment #201) to the health care reform bill moving through the Senate HELP Committee. This important amendment is co-sponsored by Senator Harkin, Senator Sherrod Brown, and Senator Murray. It does two key things for women’s health: 1) it provides coverage—with no or limited cost sharing—for women’s preventive health care and screenings; and 2) ensures patients’ access to essential community providers, including women’s health centers like Planned Parenthood, community health centers (a.k.a. federally qualified health centers), HIV/AIDS clinics, and public hospitals.

As you know, these are both big priorities for women's health organizations and we need your help TODAY in making sure your members on the Senate HELP Committee support this critical amendment. This amendment could be voted on as early as tomorrow, so please reach out to your member of Congress with both an e-mail and a phone call today. The calls coming into the HELP Committee this week from activists are a huge help, but it’s essential that offices hear directly from you.

Please call Sherrod Brown at 202-224-2315 and tell him...

Thank you so much for co-sponsoring Senator Mikulski’s women’s health amendment number 201. Expanding affordable health care coverage and protecting patients’ access to essential community providers is a critical part of health care reform, and we really appreciate everything you are doing to improve our health care system. This amendment will go a long way towards ensuring that millions of women and their families actually receive the essential health care services for which they are eligible.

Thank you for making women’s health care a priority by supporting coverage of women’s preventive care and ensuring access to the essential community providers that millions of women trust.

-Gabriel

Read more...

The Akron Beacon Journal paid tribute to Planned Parenthood of Northeast Ohio's Roberta Aber, who is retiring after 26 years of service. The full article is pasted below.

By Michael Douglas
Beacon Journal editorial page editor

Published on Sunday, Jun 28, 2009

Part of growing older involves a certain envy of those who spend an entire working career doing precisely what they enjoy (most of the time). Actually, the feeling is more complicated. Envy shares the stage with an element of delight, the pleasure in watching someone fulfill his or her passion.

Roberta Aber is one who has traveled the path she desired and chose. She has spent the past 26 years working here for Planned Parenthood, first, as the executive director of Planned Parenthood of Summit, Portage and Medina Counties and then, in 2007, becoming vice president of organizational systems for Planned Parenthood of Northeast Ohio.

On Tuesday, she will depart her office for the last time, probably after conducting the meticulous business of an inventory audit. Her colleagues have been showering her with admiring words. They talk about her quiet confidence, her capacity to think strategically, her ability to get things done well, her role as a mentor and attention to detail. (In her desk drawer, you will find every yearly calendar, recording her appointments since 1983.)

All of the accolades ring true, believe it or not. Yet one, especially, resonates. The Rev. Sandra Selby, a member of the board of directors of Planned Parenthood of Northeast Ohio, recently reminded a gathering that Aber graduated in 1965 from Mount Holyoke College in Massachusetts, the school using the phrase ''an uncommon woman'' to describe its students. The words fit Aber perfectly.

For many today, the conventions of four decades ago are as removed as rotary phones and 26 cents for a gallon of gas. Aber remembers the many paths closed to women, her mother without a driver's license until her daughter was a teenager. Then, the Supreme Court ruled in 1965, overturning state prohibitions on birth control.

Things began to change dramatically, and Aber wanted to be part of it.

All of us can cite defining moments in our cultural life, from air flight to television to the microprocessor. Few have been as momentous as the high court decision in Griswold v. Connecticut. The world opened to women in a profound way. They now could control their childbearing. They could participate fully and seize new opportunities.

Hard to argue against the benefits, the country and families enriched by the unleashing of so much talent (with ceilings still to crack and frontiers to conquer). Aber embraced the mission of Planned Parenthood, the cause of ensuring that women of all backgrounds and stations have access to services expanding choices in shaping their lives. She started in Massachusetts, and then arrived in Akron, barely two months after the Supreme Court ruled in Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, a 6-3 majority striking down several restrictions on the right to an abortion.

Abortion rights had weathered a severe test, the affirmation having lasting resonance, or so it seemed. The court held to the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that stemmed directly from the principles of privacy asserted in the Griswold ruling. What Aber soon learned is that the political fight had just begun.

The past quarter-century has featured a steady assault on abortion rights. The core of the Roe decision remains, yet restrictions have been applied and others still are sought.

Read through past articles in this newspaper, and you find Aber, in 1988, explaining to Norton residents why Planned Parenthood has opened an office in their city. To a parent concerned that Planned Parenthood seeks to erode ''my rights to my child,'' she pointed to the responsible course of providing information to sexually active teens with the aim of reducing pregnancies, avoiding consequences for which they are ill prepared.

On the 25th anniversary of the Roe decision, Aber addressed the question: Why can't we resolve the abortion debate? She challenged the notion that both sides are ''so extreme,'' reminding that Planned Parenthood hardly qualifies as a fringe group.

The observation deserves emphasis. Aber recalls those who built Planned Parenthood in Akron before she ever arrived, a Mary Babcox or Helen Paige. They weren't radicals. They were leading conventional lives, Paige serving as a nurse, Babcox the daughter of an Akron mayor who married into the well-known publishing company.

Aber explains that practically every woman has thought about birth control, the practice playing a central role in their lives. Consider that Planned Parenthood of Northeast Ohio serves roughly 55,000 clients a year. One in four women in the country have used Planned Parenthood. Six in 10 patients who receive care at such women's health centers view the facility as their primary source of health care, where they receive examinations, treatment and counseling.

In no small way, then, Planned Parenthood helps the country cope with the many lacking health insurance and ready access to medical care.

One consequence of the political turmoil long surrounding Planned Parenthood has been the curtailing of its outreach, the organization's footprint no longer as prominent in community centers and churches. Yet lately that has begun to change. Aber cites new federal Food and Drug Administration rules for prescribing medications and the development of urine screening for sexually transmitted diseases. Both advances invite a broader presence.

And what better way to propel the effort than the Roberta E. Aber Fund for Outreach Services? Established last fall, the fund already has collected $96,000, donors honoring a mission and a legacy, an uncommon woman's enduring contribution to choice.
Douglas is the Beacon Journal editorial page editor. He can be reached at 330-996-3514, or e-mailed at mdouglas@thebeaconjournal.com.

Part of growing older involves a certain envy of those who spend an entire working career doing precisely what they enjoy (most of the time). Actually, the feeling is more complicated. Envy shares the stage with an element of delight, the pleasure in watching someone fulfill his or her passion.

Roberta Aber is one who has traveled the path she desired and chose. She has spent the past 26 years working here for Planned Parenthood, first, as the executive director of Planned Parenthood of Summit, Portage and Medina Counties and then, in 2007, becoming vice president of organizational systems for Planned Parenthood of Northeast Ohio.

On Tuesday, she will depart her office for the last time, probably after conducting the meticulous business of an inventory audit. Her colleagues have been showering her with admiring words. They talk about her quiet confidence, her capacity to think strategically, her ability to get things done well, her role as a mentor and attention to detail. (In her desk drawer, you will find every yearly calendar, recording her appointments since 1983.)

All of the accolades ring true, believe it or not. Yet one, especially, resonates. The Rev. Sandra Selby, a member of the board of directors of Planned Parenthood of Northeast Ohio, recently reminded a gathering that Aber graduated in 1965 from Mount Holyoke College in Massachusetts, the school using the phrase ''an uncommon woman'' to describe its students. The words fit Aber perfectly.

For many today, the conventions of four decades ago are as removed as rotary phones and 26 cents for a gallon of gas. Aber remembers the many paths closed to women, her mother without a driver's license until her daughter was a teenager. Then, the Supreme Court ruled in 1965, overturning state prohibitions on birth control.

Things began to change dramatically, and Aber wanted to be part of it.

All of us can cite defining moments in our cultural life, from air flight to television to the microprocessor. Few have been as momentous as the high court decision in Griswold v. Connecticut. The world opened to women in a profound way. They now could control their childbearing. They could participate fully and seize new opportunities.

Hard to argue against the benefits, the country and families enriched by the unleashing of so much talent (with ceilings still to crack and frontiers to conquer). Aber embraced the mission of Planned Parenthood, the cause of ensuring that women of all backgrounds and stations have access to services expanding choices in shaping their lives. She started in Massachusetts, and then arrived in Akron, barely two months after the Supreme Court ruled in Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, a 6-3 majority striking down several restrictions on the right to an abortion.

Abortion rights had weathered a severe test, the affirmation having lasting resonance, or so it seemed. The court held to the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that stemmed directly from the principles of privacy asserted in the Griswold ruling. What Aber soon learned is that the political fight had just begun.

The past quarter-century has featured a steady assault on abortion rights. The core of the Roe decision remains, yet restrictions have been applied and others still are sought.

Read through past articles in this newspaper, and you find Aber, in 1988, explaining to Norton residents why Planned Parenthood has opened an office in their city. To a parent concerned that Planned Parenthood seeks to erode ''my rights to my child,'' she pointed to the responsible course of providing information to sexually active teens with the aim of reducing pregnancies, avoiding consequences for which they are ill prepared.

On the 25th anniversary of the Roe decision, Aber addressed the question: Why can't we resolve the abortion debate? She challenged the notion that both sides are ''so extreme,'' reminding that Planned Parenthood hardly qualifies as a fringe group.

The observation deserves emphasis. Aber recalls those who built Planned Parenthood in Akron before she ever arrived, a Mary Babcox or Helen Paige. They weren't radicals. They were leading conventional lives, Paige serving as a nurse, Babcox the daughter of an Akron mayor who married into the well-known publishing company.

Aber explains that practically every woman has thought about birth control, the practice playing a central role in their lives. Consider that Planned Parenthood of Northeast Ohio serves roughly 55,000 clients a year. One in four women in the country have used Planned Parenthood. Six in 10 patients who receive care at such women's health centers view the facility as their primary source of health care, where they receive examinations, treatment and counseling.

In no small way, then, Planned Parenthood helps the country cope with the many lacking health insurance and ready access to medical care.

One consequence of the political turmoil long surrounding Planned Parenthood has been the curtailing of its outreach, the organization's footprint no longer as prominent in community centers and churches. Yet lately that has begun to change. Aber cites new federal Food and Drug Administration rules for prescribing medications and the development of urine screening for sexually transmitted diseases. Both advances invite a broader presence.

And what better way to propel the effort than the Roberta E. Aber Fund for Outreach Services? Established last fall, the fund already has collected $96,000, donors honoring a mission and a legacy, an uncommon woman's enduring contribution to choice.

Douglas is the Beacon Journal editorial page editor.

Read more...

Planned Parenthood Affiliates of Ohio released their monthly Thanks and Spanks last week. The organization's cheers and jeers go to two groups or individuals who have made a difference in reproductive rights, either good or bad.

The regular state budget process ends June 30th. Unfortunately, one provision still in the budget is a request for federal funding for abstinence-only programs. This needs to go!

Last month, over 1,200 Planned Parenthood supporters sent emails to all of the legislators on the budget conference committee, letting them know that abstinence-only funding is a waste of taxpayer money and leaves our teens without the information they need to make smart decisions.

Here's what some of them had to say:

I teach sexuality education to health teachers, and we are all frustrated by abstinence-only programs that deny students basic educational information. Abstinence should absolutely be included in the health curriculum but should not comprise the entire sexuality unit. Beth – Alliance, Ohio

If abstinence-only education worked, there would be NO unwanted pregnancies. Abstinence-only education leads to the need for abortion. To avoid abortion, educate people about preventing pregnancy.
Amy - Silver Lake, OH

Ohio has been ineffective in stopping teen births especially among lower income and minority students. Teen mothers are at the bottom economically and will never be able to rise out of poverty. Ohio must stop its antiquated approach to sex education and start trying to solve the problem. David - Columbus, Ohio

As a nursing instructor, I tell my students to only use evidence based practice and to leave ideology at home. Abstinence-only programs are not based on valid research and do not reduce rates of teen pregnancies or abortions.
Dorothy - Chardon, OH

I have children and I told them the facts about sex and birth control by the time they were in middle school. My daughter thanked me later, saying she was told all sorts of nonsense about sex by her peers who had not been taught. Two teens I know have contracted venereal disease. Abstinence-only teaching FAILS. We cannot let ourselves be locked in by accepting funding that limits our ability to help protect our children. Cheryl - New Straitsville, Ohio

When a woman seeks an abortion without notifying the man who impregnated her, there is usually more to the story. We just don't know. That's why we trust women to make the best decisions about their bodies, and provide them with access to doctors who can give advice and services in a confidential manner.

In the coming days, Representative John Adams (R-Sidney) has indicated he will be introducing a bill that he's nicknamed the "Father's Rights Act." We call it the "Abortion Veto" bill. This legislation would require a woman seeking an abortion to ask the man's permission before receiving an abortion. If the identity of the father was in doubt or unknown, then a paternity test would be required, costing up to $2,000. Even the non-partisan Legislative Service Commission cautioned the idea "raises constitutional questions, particularly as it applies to pre-viability abortions."

Trust women, Representative Adams. They know better than you do.





-Gabriel

Read more...